Monday, October 08, 2012

M & A The Perfect Corporate Crime

CEOs have ripped apart shareholders’ wealth globally under the guise of M&As; Indian firms more so! B&E’s Manish K. Pandey, Deepak R. Patra and Karan Mehrishi undertake the most radical analysis of the recent past and destroy age-old perceptions!

The pity is, Indians never learn! You’ll get the drift by the time you end the introduction. First, the dirt! The year 2000 was the eve of the glorious new century, and a boon for the Big-6 M&A consulting firms. And why not! For these global consulting proponents, an example like the year 2000 Vodafone-Mannesmann merger was god’s gift multiplied many times over. It was proclaimed to be the single largest deal in history. Sir Christopher Gent, then CEO, Vodafone paid a smashing $190 billion for Germany’s Mannesmann AG, making Vodafone the biggest operator in Europe. The combined entity was valued at $365 billion, making it the world’s fourth largest company overnight. What better a gift could the M&A brayers ask for? Wasn’t this M&A deal enough proof that M&As were/are the only dynamic and rapid solution forward to mammoth growth and that all those who had criticised M&As for the past so many years were nothing but dimwits?

If Gent’s strategy cup ran full of suicidal moves, Arun Sarin – who was on the Vodafone board since June 1999 (and was equally, if not more, to blame) and who took over from Gent in April 2000 – redefined the standard of how much shareholder value could ever be destroyed from a company. Eight years since the deal, the value of Vodafone in terms of market capitalisation stands at $161.4 billion (as on July 24, 2008), down by a sickening $203.6 billion, a fall of 53%! Arun Sarin ensured that in the last eight years since the merger, Vodafone has become the biggest loss making company ever in the history of mankind! The loss: $86 billion! Both Arun Sarin (who exited in June 2008) and Christopher Gent, apart from the other top management, retired multi-millionaires, a far cry from thousands of Vodafone pauper shareholders.

If that sounded absurd, Gary Foresee took on the infamy mantle with ease. Gary joined Sprint as CEO in the year 2003. Signing bonus amount: $6 odd million! Subsequent years’ pay: Between $1.5-6 million! Gary’s claim to (in)fame was ensuring Sprint’s spectacular merger with Nextel in 2004-05. He sold the deal on the fact that the combined telecom giant would have a subscriber base of 53.8 million in the US! What he sweetly left out was the disaster the deal could be. At the time of the deal, the Sprint Nextel common stock was trading at $26.9; it’s at a sickening $8.30 today! While many shareholders got wiped out Mr. Gary Foresee was kicked out at the end of 2007. His severance package? $40 million!

Charles Prince is an equal, if not better peer for these heroes. He, as the Chief Administrative Officer, engineered the utterly disastrous $140 billion merger of Citibank with Travelers Group ten years back. Then he ensured the company jumped into the mortgage black hole. Till date, Citigroup has been forced to write off almost $41 billion because of Prince’s royal exigencies! He was “eased out” in November 2007! Apart from his wholly owned $94 million vested stock holdings in Citi, he got $28 million further stock options, (not forgetting the $53 million during his last four years as Group CEO), plus a pension of $1.74 million; and this apart from a $10.4 million “bonus” that shareholders were made to pay him. [Citi has now recruited Vikram Pandit as the CEO, paying him a cannon ball destroying never before seen signing bonus of $241 million! Since he has arrived, Citi stock prices have tumbled by 25%!].

December 31, 2007, saw Richard Parsons resigning as the greatest CEO of Time-Warner. Greatest, because he joined the board in 1991 [became President in 1995] and oversaw the supernova of a merger between Time and AOL. The companies had a combined value of $247 billion during the deal. Today, the combined entity is worth a mind numbingly low $58 billion. Parsons earned on an average $10.64 million per year. By the way, he’s now the Chairman of the group!

With $37 billion involved, Dieter Zetsche, then on the Daimler Benz board, squeezed through the merger with Chrysler. In 2007, CEO Zetsche made Daimler Chrysler part ways with a deal worth only 21.5% ($7.4 billion) of the total acquisition value! Millionaire Patricia Russo, CEO Alcatel-Lucent, has a history of destroying shareholder wealth. At the time of the merger of Alcatel and Lucent, the entity had a share price of $15.4 (March 31, 2006). July 24, 2008, the price is $6.09 (62% fall). CEO Meg Whitman, who ensured eBay bought off Skype, also ensured eBay’s price fell from close to $40 (September 9, 2005), to $25 (July 24, 2008). Shareholders be damned; she donated $30 million of her personal wealth to Princeton in 2007 to start the Whitman College!

Read more......

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Saturday, October 06, 2012

Organ Anybody?

Gap Between Demand and Supply

A few years back, the Indian health sector was pummelled by a series of organ smuggling and theft scandals involving the who’s who of the industry. Tales galore came to the fore about doctors who were taking out properly functioning organs without the consent of patients during operations and pushing them onto the illegal organ trade market. Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu are the biggest markets in terms of the illegal trade.

One reason for the illegal trade is the failure of the government in promoting legal organ donation. In two years, Tamil Nadu transplant hospitals utilised just 764 organs (Oct 2008 to Oct 2010). The figure is worse in Hyderabad, where in eight years, the figure is just 597 organs transplanted (June 2002 – Sep 2010). Even after over fifteen years of Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994 being passed, only kidney donations are in practice. Cadaver donations are yet to see the light of day. At present, out of the 1,50,000 patients requiring kidney transplants, only 200 get kidneys by way of donations from the deceased.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Friday, October 05, 2012

B-School Survey Panel Meet , 2010

August 12, 2010, saw Planman Media and Business & Economy magazine play host to eminent corporate personalities of India, in a Panel Meet discussion, for Business & Economy magazine’s highly coveted annual issue – India’s Best B-Schools Special Issue 2010. The most unique element about the B&E B-school ranking is that in this particular ranking, the B-schools are ranked by renowned industry leaders (please refer to ‘List of 20 Panel Members’ section for the names of panelists). Considering the importance of the meet, four distinguished industry leaders – Dr. Wilfried Aulbur (CEO, Mercedes-Benz India), Mr. Michael Boneham (MD, Ford Motor Co. India), Mr. Naresh Gupta (MD, Adobe India) and Mr. Brian Tempest (Former CEO, Ranbaxy and presently, Independent Director, Religare Hichens Harrison) – sent their comments and discussions through the audio/visual format. The round-table discussion revolved about the parameters on which B-schools are judged today, and means by which such ranking can be made more transparent and just. Professor Arindam Chaudhuri, Editor-In-Chief of Planman Media expressed his views on how “faculty and course contents” are the two most important elements to deliver overall knowledge in B-schools. He also stressed upon a need for a constant focus on personality development and communication skills. Mr. Girish Vaidya. Former Director, Infosys Leadership Institute spoke about why B-Schools should be ranked on the basis of “curriculum, global exposure and cultural stability, along with the extent to which entrepreneurial programs” are encouraged. Mr. Dhiraj Mathur, Exec. Director, PwC gave a strong argument on why “a strong orientation towards ethics” is important for a B-school. While K. M. Nanaiah, MD, Pitney Bowes India, also highlighted the need for a “globalised curriculum and industry interface”, Mr. Sumeet Nair, Chairperson of Fashion Foundation of India justified the need for “encouraging an entrepreneurial zeal” amongst the B-school students. The event was a huge success and all the participants concluded that much more needs to be done to arrive at the ideal B-school of tomorrow.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Monday, September 10, 2012

M. R. Rao, CEO, SKS Microfinance Ltd.

Launched in 1998, SKS Microfinance is one of the fastest growing Micro Financial Institutions (MFIs) in the world, which has served more than 5 million women members in poor regions of India till date. Of course, the company has been in the news for the wrong reasons following the unceremonious exit of its ex-CEO Suresh Gurumani. Current CEO M. R. Rao talks about the company’s business model and challenges it faces: 

B&E: What is the maximum amount of loan that can be availed and repayment options available?
MR:
All members (clients) are eligible to borrow Rs.12,000 depending upon the activity which the member undertakes in the first year of joining SKS Group. From the second year onward, the loan size is increased by Rs.4,000. Loan repayments follow a weekly repayment schedule. All repayments and fresh disbursements happen during the centre meeting, which is held every week at every center. Our loans are given for a period of 50 weeks.

B&E: What kind of problems do you face while repayment of loans?
MR:
SKS enjoys a very strong repayment record and our NPAs are negligible. If a member is unable to repay an instalment, the other members in the group/center share the responsibility for the repayment. The few cases of defaults are usually due to migration or due to some natural calamity.

B&E: What are the rates of interest charged by SKS?
MR:
SKS works in 19 states. In Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Orissa, we charge a flat rate of interest at 12.5% and in rest of the states, the flat rate is set at 15% currently. In the newer states where we have started, our rates are a little higher at 15% flat and 26% diminishing. We also charge a loan cover fee of 1% that helps us offer insurance for the loan period.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face